This is a wide-ranging thought-dump which I started, and can’t properly finish - I have Christmas shopping to do - (and an international opera festival to bring off on a shoestring…)
After three decades of producing, performing, and wrestling with opera funding, I've got some [more] thoughts on why our beloved art form is struggling. It's not just an Australian problem—opera is facing challenges worldwide. We have much to learn from overseas models, but the Australian answer will need to be hemisphere-specific. We’re not like other societies, and there lies our biggest opportunity.
The Great Risk Aversion
Opera's biggest enemy right now is the establishment fear of taking artistic risks. This has led to too many performances that look the same, companies losing their unique identity, and audience confusion about what opera is (and why their taxes should support it.)
The Australian Opera Dilemma
We've got a serious case of ‘checkbox programming’ in Australia. Funders, managers and administrators are increasingly calling the artistic shots. Well-meaning policies are stifling artistic expression. The funding stagnation situation primarily falls on the shoulders of government and its agencies, who, correct me if I’m wrong, are paid partly to dish out the dollars, and partly to be advocates for the companies they fund - through securing tax-payer funds. Whose failure is it, that working conditions for Australian artists have declined dramatically (pardon the pun…) over the past 20 years? (The complex issues of governance, boards and systemic legacy are substantial topics are reserved for a separate discussion.)
Opera Australia faces its own challenges in claiming a strong and unique presence. It is tasked with appeasing the establishment, holding on to its national profile - as an international player, adhering to government-set cultural policy, while also dealing with the corporatisation of their ‘rightful’ home as the national company - the Sydney Opera House. The pride when citizens of other countries speak of their opera houses and substantial seasons is not insignificant. A performing arts centre is a building, and they’re everywhere, but an ‘opera house’ says the art form is sincerely valued. The Sydney Opera House is a physical manifestation of the place that opera has traditionally (well, since 1973…) held in the Australian psyche. Touring is all well and good, but shouldn’t come at the expense of the main event.
The Collaboration Trap
The co-production model for opera seems to have backfired. Audiences struggle to differentiate between companies, which undermines their ability to cultivate strong artistic loyalties—essential for advocacy and support. This approach has also diminished the diversity of artistic offerings. While partnering with other government-funded opera companies to co-present productions seems convenient and practical, the primary focus on cost-sharing rather than prioritising audience impact or long-term vision has harmed the overall health of the opera sector.
Here’s a radical idea: perhaps collaboration works best if the contributing parties are unequal. Otherwise, the offering is the same old to the same old.
In my mind, it makes little artistic sense for Australian companies to collaborate on staging standard works like Mozart or Verdi operas, no matter how exciting or progressive the creative leadership might be. It is not that difficult to do a cost-effective staging of a 200-300 year old opera. After all, there are many prototypes. Co-producing new commissions however, deserves a pooling of resources, offering a meaningful opportunity to contribute to a lasting legacy. Such collaborations benefit the entire Australian opera scene by bringing new works of living creators to life—pieces that might not otherwise be produced—and often making them accessible in multiple locations. Partnerships/collaborations beyond the opera sector, such as with animation, cutting-edge design, cine-theatre, or art orchestras, are particularly valuable, and enrich the art form significantly.
Artistic Direction: Missing Ingredient
There's a real fear of letting artists, especially singers, have a say in decision-making. We’re people who live and breathe the art form - we don’t feel a need to apologise for opera being complex and multi-faceted. Some of us are not just pretty voices —we've got brains and ideas for connecting with Australian audiences too, but we rarely get to sit in the room where policies and programs are set.
There is a prevailing mistrust of the artistic vision, not just within the sector itself, but in the corporate/business/philanthropy world. I encounter suspicion regularly around what an artist or artistic company might ‘take’ or have to gain... I don’t think it is overstepping to say artists always give more than they take. And that an artistic vision is a just that - a dream of something that might be, with compelling ideas (but not necessarily the whole team) of what it will take to get there.
Has anyone else thought that the popularity of music theatre have something to do with the language it’s performed in…?
Or,
Perhaps Australian audiences don’t go to the theatre to read…
English National Opera (ENO) was founded with a clear mission: to make opera accessible to a wider audience by performing foreign works in English. The company's commitment to singing in English was seen as a way to enhance the emotional connection between performers and audiences, alongside accessibility for the so-called “working-class”. ENO's decision to deviate from its original language policy has contributed to a loss of identity and connection with its target audience - losing its footing with the hearts and minds of its audience, and ultimately, its funding.
The success of opera companies often hinges on their ability to balance artistic integrity with accessibility and cultural relevance, a delicate equilibrium. This challenge is faced by opera companies worldwide.
Germany - still providing Australian opera singers with their best hope of an ongoing salary:
As much as travel - and performing in another country - is a thrill, for many of the most talented Australian artists, it is their only hope of job security. Disconnection from culture, family and lifestyle is a prospect to be faced by anyone who happens to reach that distinguished level of artistic accomplishment and wants to sustain a career. In 1930s, prominent Australians bemoaned the talent drain. Almost 100 years later, it is still happening - our best artists are, mostly, on the other side of the world.
In contrast to the declining opera sector in the UK especially, Germany's opera scene has thrived (comparatively…) due to its willingness to embrace artistic risk. This success is not solely due to government subsidies or cultural connections - it is bound up in a fundamental trust in bold, artistic visions. German opera houses have consistently encouraged productions that challenge audiences and push the boundaries of the art form. Despite the criticism of ‘Regietheater* by those who are invested, personally or professionally, in ‘old opera ways’, opera’s survival doesn’t lie in what has already been written, but in what is being done now - because that’s what people come to see.
*Regietheater—directors going wild with interpretations—is a divisive topic - mostly, the criticism is from people privileged to know what composers and librettists might have originally written. Without new takes, we're running a musical museum - if you’ve seen it once, you don’t have to go back. The risk is of course that some productions might be outrageous, but at least they get people talking and spark curiosity for the next interpretation!
Rethink the Whole Funding Model
Time to Shake Things Up
1. Trust ‘outsiders’. Open up discussions and include ‘the great unfunded’.
2. Stop obsessing over ticking policy boxes. By the time its a bureaucracy states a policy, the world has moved on*.
3. Stop apologising for opera (the art form being expensive, complex, artistic)
The current (announced last week) review of Opera Australia is a start, but we need to think bigger:
1.Take a hard look at Creative Australia first / as well.
2.Question who's really making the decisions that affect not just a legacy, but a secure future for talented Australian artists.
3. Give opera its own, democratic, funding category - state and federal.
(Did you know that unless you’re an already funded state/federal company, you can’t actually apply for funding in a designated ‘opera’ category through Creative Australia? You have to choose to be peer-assessed by a music OR theatre panel…)
*recent events have shaken my confidence in contributing to the building of an increasingly progressive society. I continue to hope, and work towards, riding a wave out of this dystopian nightmare, which has people, instead of loudly blaming tax policies, governments and their agencies, withdrawing from the very thing that works to keep society informed, civilised and kind: arts and culture.